exsecutus | inbox.

From:

[ Thoughtfully - ]

Yeah. And she's old enough that she probably knows that she'll die fairly soon, so she probably hasn't got much interest in accumulating a lot of power.

From:

exsecutus

Which is also being used against her. As if it is so terrible a thing, to have someone in power who will not be in power for the next hundred years. We should strive to impose such limits.

And yet we'll see the weak pouring out in droves to support a woman of clear ambition.

From:

rathercommon

Which one?

From:

exsecutus

Agathe of Cumberland, of course.

From:

rathercommon

Really? But - she doesn't seem so bad.

From:

exsecutus

In some ways, she isn't. But we settle then for mediocrity. For the watered-down version of truer and stronger ideals and intentions. And her ambition, which she has never disguised, means that she will compromise what strong intentions she does have, so that she can get what she wants.

If the Chantry expects to lead the people it should give a shit about the people. All of them. And that should not be compromised.

From:

rathercommon

[ Argument for argument's sake: ]

But if it's a choice between mediocrity and awfulness, oughtn't you choose the former? Elise hasn't got much of a chance, from the sound of it.

From:

exsecutus

Mediocrity changes nothing. Complacency is a softer awfulness. One that can be ignored. It is not so bad. And because it is not so bad, that is where it will always stay.

From:

rathercommon

And is that so bad, for the Divine? I mean, she's basically just some priest, right?

From:

exsecutus

The Divine can change doctrine. Her interpretation of texts and the precedents that she could set could change everything for the disenfranchised. For mages, for dwarves, qunari--elves--Rifters, if you will be motivated to care out of self-interest--the poor, of all races and types.

Whatever I think of the Chantry, and I think very fucking little of it--I would still have to admit its power. However ill-deserved it might be.

I would rather the seat be taken by someone truly controversial. For better or for worse.

From:

rathercommon

For worse? Why? So people would lose faith in it?

From:

exsecutus

Or rebel against it. Or both, ideally, a loss of faith leading to a rebellion. If we allow ourselves a dream of idealism.

I would see that type of election stopped before it reached that point.

From:

rathercommon

So you don't want to see that sort of violence?

From:

exsecutus

Of course I fucking do. But I don't trust that the violence would turn to anything productive or come to any end other than a return to normalcy. People lose their stomachs too easily. They let themselves be cowed and soothed even to their detriment.

Do you?

From:

rathercommon

[ She's quiet a moment. Does she?

Well. Even though she knows he'll hate this answer, she's got to say it: ]

I don't think I do.

From:

exsecutus

[Scathingly, in a tone that might better suit a teenager--]

Really.

[Congratulations, he hates the answer.]

From:

rathercommon

Yeah.

[ She gnaws on the inside of her lip. ]

I mean - Okay. What is it that you want to see in the world? What would it need to get to for you to be content? Hypothetically.

From:

exsecutus

To never again be asked a question so useless and inane. Tell me what you mean plainly, don't try to take my hand and dance me around it.

From:

rathercommon

[ A sigh - ] It's not an inane question, or a useless one. We're not fighting just for the purpose of fighting. And we're not fighting just to create chaos. We're fighting because we want to see change done. I mean -

[ She takes a breath, and thinks a moment, then hesitantly articulates - ]

What I care about is - justice. Seeing that everyone's got the same basic opportunities as everyone else, whether they're elf or mage or human, born from a noble line or a common one. And freedom, too - 'cause justice is no good if no one has opportunities. So I've got to think, then - does violence on that scale build that world I imagine? Or will it just slow the progress?

From:

exsecutus

Where will you be building your world? Over the top of the one that always exists?

[Sarcasm doesn't last long. The pendulum swings back to furious passion a moment later. If they were speaking in person, Nikos would be leaned across the table toward her.]

You must level what exists. What justice can there ever be before that is done? They'll take your intentions and they'll pat you on the head and tell you that you've done well, and with their other hand they'll conduct their business as usual. They will twist what you intend and continue to play by their rules, behind curtains and closed doors, and you will never see it until it is too late. You need to fucking destroy what has come before, burn it to the ground and lay down salt and bury the rich and the powerful beneath so much lime they never resurrect. And then you can build.

Can you think of a peaceful way to get a king to set down his crown? Will he do it if you are very nice? If you yap at him, day and night?

From:

rathercommon

[ A small shrug. Matter-of-factly: ]

Could just cut his throat and his throat alone. Don't get me wrong, I'd never suggest that you can win a better world politely. But -

[ She tilts her head to the side. ]

Can you ever bury the rich and powerful that deep? Can you ever really wipe them out? I mean - the Chantry started out as a group of rebels trying to resist the wickedness of the Tevinter Empire, didn't they. And look at what they are now.

From:

exsecutus

Fuck off, [Nikos snaps, first. His failed regicide is a wound that still festers, and even if that's not what Kitty is referring to, the words bite like flies inside that old wound. Because it's so easy, to cut the throat of a king. They ruin that, too. Maybe he should say that. Instead he takes a big swig of wine.]

Everything grows rotten. Some things faster than others. If I have a peach and it turns black, I throw it away and I get a new peach. I don't resign myself to the rotten peach, and I don't vow to never eat a peach again. People should feel that same way of kings, earls, banns, dutchesses--anyone they would elect to lead them. When they stop working for you, you eliminate them. You start again.

If I had my way, the people would rule. And then that would fail, eventually, because people are fucking greedy, because they will never truly do what is right for them, because they cannot choose what is hard, what will hurt them even if it is for the greater good. So I would hope on that day, there would be someone like me, who would burn it all down again.

From:

rathercommon

[ Kitty starts to protest Nikos' snarl - but then she remembers his personal history with attempted-murder-of-kings. For a moment, she starts to apologize - and then she decides that an apology would probably just make it worse. So she doesn't say anything.

Instead: ]

But what if people weren't greedy and selfish?

From:

exsecutus

[He laughs. It's a pretty unkind laugh.]

Yes. What if. Are there any other implausibilities you'd like to impose on this setting, before we discuss it.

From:

rathercommon

[ A disapproving sniff. ]

No. That's the only one, since it's the one that matters. Look - I would contend that people are awful because they learn to be awful.